Strategy for Increasing Geothermal Power Plant Capacity Through Organic Rankine Cycle Integration Using Matlab Modeling

Authors

Keywords:

Geothermal_energy, Organic_Rankine_Cycle (ORC), MATLAB_modeling, Renewable_energy, Power_plant, efficiency

Abstract

The increasing global demand for sustainable and clean energy sources has intensified the focus on geothermal energy. Geothermal power plants, utilizing Earth's core heat, offer a stable energy supply. However, their efficiency can be significantly enhanced by integrating advanced technologies such as the Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC). This study explores the integration of ORC with geothermal power plants using MATLAB modeling to optimize system performance. The MATLAB simulations demonstrate that ORC integration can enhance power output by up to 20%, utilizing low-temperature geothermal resources more effectively. The model evaluates various working fluids, heat exchanger designs, and cycle configurations to identify optimal conditions. The results highlight the potential of ORC to increase overall plant efficiency and capacity, making geothermal energy a more competitive and sustainable option. This integration maximizes energy utilization, reduces greenhouse gas emissions, and aligns with global sustainability goals. Future research should focus on advanced ORC configurations, real-world validations, and broader renewable energy applications to fully realize the benefits of this technology.

References

R. Loni et al., “A critical review of power generation using geothermal-driven organic Rankine cycle,” Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog., vol. 25, no. July, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.tsep.2021.101028.

G. Liu, Y. Qin, and D. Ji, “Enhancing geothermal ORC power generation with SOFC: A comprehensive parametric study on thermodynamic performance,” Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 233, p. 121161, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.121161.

T. Li, X. Li, X. Gao, H. Gao, and N. Meng, “Geothermal power generation improvement of organic Rankine flash cycle using exergy, advanced exergy and exergoeconomic analyses,” Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 223, p. 120032, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.120032.

V. M. Ambriz-Díaz, I. Y. Rosas, Ó. Chávez, and C. Rubio-Maya, “4E Assessment of an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) Activated With Waste Heat of a Flash–Binary Geothermal Power Plant,” Entropy, vol. 24, no. 12, p. 1832, 2022, doi: 10.3390/e24121832.

D. Matuszewska, “Economic Analysis of Gas Turbine Using to Increase Efficiency of the Organic Rankine Cycle,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 75, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su16010075.

M. Kaczmarczyk, B. Tomaszewska, and L. Paj?k, “Geological and Thermodynamic Analysis of Low Enthalpy Geothermal Resources to Electricity Generation Using ORC and Kalina Cycle Technology,” Energies, vol. 13, no. 6, p. 1335, 2020, doi: 10.3390/en13061335.

T. Eller, F. Heberle, and D. Brüggemann, “Transient Modelling and Simulation of a Double-Stage Organic Rankine Cycle,” 2019, doi: 10.3384/ecp19157679.

W. Strielkowski, E. Tarkhanova, M. Tvaronavi?, and Y. Petrenko, “Renewable Energy in the Sustainable Development of Electrical,” Energies, vol. 14, pp. 1–24, 2021.

P. Lu et al., “Design and Optimization of Organic Rankine Cycle Based on Heat Transfer Enhancement and Novel Heat Exchanger: A Review,” Energies, vol. 16, no. 3, 2023, doi: 10.3390/en16031380.

J. Wang, Y. Dai, and P. Zhao, “Thermodynamic Analysis and Optimization of a Flash-Binary Geothermal Power Generation System,” Geothermics, vol. 55, pp. 69–77, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2015.01.012.

A. Franco, “Power production from a moderate temperature geothermal resource with regenerative Organic Rankine Cycles,” Energy Sustain. Dev., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 411–419, 2011, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2011.06.002.

F. Calise, D. Capuano, and L. Vanoli, “Dynamic Simulation and Exergo-Economic Optimization of a Hybrid Solar–Geothermal Cogeneration Plant,” Energies, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 2606–2646, 2015, doi: 10.3390/en8042606.

S. Saadon and N. A. M. Nasir, “Performance and Sustainability Analysis of an Organic Rankine Cycle System in Subcritical and Supercritical Conditions for Waste Heat Recovery,” Energies, vol. 13, no. 12, p. 3035, 2020, doi: 10.3390/en13123035.

D. M. Atia, H. M. Farghally, N. M. Ahmed, and H. T. El-Madany, “Organic Rankine Cycle Based Geothermal Energy for Power Generation in Egypt,” Energy Power Eng., vol. 09, no. 12, pp. 814–828, 2017, doi: 10.4236/epe.2017.912051.

F. Fatigati, A. Coletta, R. Carapellucci, and R. Cipollone, “Theoretical and experimental analysis of the impact of a recuperative stage on the performance of an ORC-based solar microcogeneration unit,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 2648, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2648/1/012008.

F. Heberle and D. Brüggemann, “Thermo-Economic Evaluation of Organic Rankine Cycles for Geothermal Power Generation Using Zeotropic Mixtures,” Energies, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 2097–2124, 2015, doi: 10.3390/en8032097.

X. Wang et al., “Working Fluid Selection for Organic Rankine Cycle Power Generation Using Hot Produced Supercritical CO2 From a Geothermal Reservoir,” Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 149, pp. 1287–1304, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.12.112.

M. Hijriawan et al., “Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) in geothermal power plants,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1402, no. 4, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1402/4/044064.

M. L. Iriani, “The Energy Transition Dilemma in European Union (Eu) Region,” J. Din. Glob., vol. 7, no. 01, pp. 122–135, 2022, doi: 10.36859/jdg.v7i01.980.

G. U. Sankar, C. G. Moorthy, C. Ramasamy, and G. Kumar, “A Review on Recent Opportunities in MATLAB Software Based Modelling for Thermoelectric Applications,” Int. J. Energy Appl. Technol., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 70–79, 2021, doi: 10.31593/ijeat.882470.

P. F. Temgoua Nanfack, I. Mamate Abakaka, A. Aziz, and D. Tsuanyo, “Analysis of Programming Languages Used in Solving Energy Problems,” E3s Web Conf., vol. 354, p. 1006, 2022, doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202235401006.

P. J. Yekoladio, T. Bello?Ochende, and J. P. Meyer, “Thermodynamic Analysis and Performance Optimization of Organic Rankine Cycles for the Conversion of Low-to-Moderate Grade Geothermal Heat,” Int. J. Energy Res., vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 1256–1271, 2015, doi: 10.1002/er.3326.

P. Morrone and A. Algieri, “Integrated Geothermal Energy Systems for Small-Scale Combined Heat and Power Production: Energy and Economic Investigation,” Appl. Sci., vol. 10, no. 19, p. 6639, 2020, doi: 10.3390/app10196639.

F. Marty, S. Serra, S. Sochard, and J.-M. Reneaume, “Exergy Analysis and Optimization of a Combined Heat and Power Geothermal Plant,” Energies, vol. 12, no. 6, p. 1175, 2019, doi: 10.3390/en12061175.

M. Yang and R. Yeh, “Economic Performances Optimization of an Organic Rankine Cycle System With Lower Global Warming Potential Working Fluids in Geothermal Application,” Renew. Energy, vol. 85, pp. 1201–1213, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2015.07.067.

B. B. Misra and S. K. Mohapatra, “Tools and Resources for Metabolomics Research Community: A 2017–2018 Update,” Electrophoresis, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 227–246, 2018, doi: 10.1002/elps.201800428.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-20