Skyhawk Scientific Journal of Aviation implements the following review process policy:

1. The Editor receives the manuscript from the author;
2. The Editor evaluates the manuscript (purpose, scope, journal template, and supplementary data);
3. The Editor rejects if it does not meet the criteria;
4. The Editor manually checks the manuscript for plagiarism in offline and online databases;
5. The Editor rejects if significant plagiarism is found and then contacts the author for clarification if minor plagiarism is found;
6. The Editor sends the manuscript to the reviewer along with the review form (blind review, where both reviewer and author remain anonymous);
7. The reviewer returns the review form to the Editor (along with a revised manuscript if necessary);
8. The Editor makes the decision (rejected, requires major revisions, requires minor revisions, or accepted);
9. Confirmation to the author;
10. If there are revisions, the author revises the manuscript and it must be returned to the Editor without delay;
11. Manuscripts returned more than one month later will be considered a new submission.

 

OJS Workflow Chart